How desperate are these Royal times?

Overheard at Kauffman Stadium last night: "Maybe the Royals could boost their offense by signing whoever's leading the Japanese league in home runs. Oh, wait a second. That's Craig Brazell."

Overheard at Kauffman Stadium last night, part 2 (just before the start of the first game, when there were several people in the stands): "Geez, it looks like there was a bomb threat."

Read in my e-mail inbox this morning: "I thought we were supposed to be better? This is as bad as 2004."

From what I can tell, former Royal Aaron Guiel was/is/maybe leading Japan in home runss, but, yes, it's fair to say the shine is off that 6-2 start.

Some people blame the defense, the offense, the pitching, Tony Pena, Trey Hillman, plenty of blame to go around.

You know who I blame?

Brian Bannister and Zack Greinke.

Yep. I blame Banny and Greinke. If they could pitch every game, instead of needing to rest for five days, the Royals might be something like 20-2.

With losing two last night, the Royals have matched their longest losing streak from last year and are poised to challenge some of Buddy Bell's most impressive slides.

I really thought this year was going to be a little different, and think I still do, just that this is as bad as it's going to be all year.

But what do you guys think? Still optimistic? Nobody expected any titles this year, so whatever, but it's not a good sign when a team can't go one month without losing seven in a rown.

The biggest problem here is clearly the offense, averaging a steady 3.2 runs per game, on pace for 515.

There are a million different ways to illustrate just how bad the Royals' offense has been, but here's one you probably haven't heard: Mark Teahen has hit third since the fifth game of the year and has four RBIs. You know who else has four RBIs? Arizona's Brandon Webb, who has two hits in 10 at bats and is also, you know, a pitcher.

Then again, as a friend points out, Webb is hitting in a better lineup.

Anyway, all this is sort of a long way of asking you guys at what point will you start asking for Barry Bonds? I think it'd be a bad move, and I also don't think it will happen for a list of reasons, but he's out there, track record and baggage and all, and would certainly add some pop to the Royals' lineup.

I e-mailed a Royals fan of mine, a guy who HATES Bonds, and here's what he said:

"Bonds just more or less stays to himself. Plus, I still remember Barry dressing up as Paula Abdul which means he will at least give a token effort to get along with his teammates (editor's note: it does?)...Barry would surely help attendance which means (more money) in the future."

What do you guys think? You're not that desperate yet, are you?

Submitted by Sam Mellinger on April 25, 2008 - 8:13am.
| login or register to post comments
Submitted by chucketal on April 29, 2008 - 1:43pm.

I recently changed investment advisors. As I told my new guy, "I feel much more confident having YOU lose money for me than the previous guy."

Dayton Moore ain't Allard Baird. Trey Hillman ain't Tony Muser or Buddy Bell. You're starting from a better, smarter place. And let's remember, this is a cross-country road trip this baseball season, not a trip to the 7-11 for smokes.

The Tampa Bay Devil Rays are hot right now, but how hot will they be in a month, even a week? Give it time, know we're moving in the right direction, and realize that over the course of the season there will be ups and downs and that we, as Royals fans, will always assume the good thing is about to explode, and the bad thing is here to stay. It really ain't, but only positive conditioning will allow us to change that mindset.

chucketal

Submitted by bfos7215 on April 25, 2008 - 3:31pm.

Yeah, that's a REAL tough choice.

Submitted by wmenez on April 25, 2008 - 3:13pm.

...that Ryan Shealy isn't even hitting his weight and has four homers at Omaha?

Submitted by RoyalsonRadioetc on April 25, 2008 - 1:19pm.

Would anyone want Barry Bonds all he does is hit HR's draw walks and pile up RBI's. I would much rather have a powerless .270 hitter with way less walks and RBI's but is a "hustler" a "gamer" a guy who is "gritty".
Yep we're looking at about 7 more years of 8 Homers a year at 1B from Ross Gload

One of the Top 1,000,0000 Royals Blogs royalsonradioetc.blogspot.com

Submitted by trc900 on April 28, 2008 - 9:29pm.

Why would anyone want a powerless hitter that'll bat around .270? Oh wait, I just described BARRY BONDS. He batted .276 last year with 66 RBI's. He also came in at 28 home runs. Not a bad number, but for a guy who's "a power hitter," that ain't amazing. For the record, his BA was 12 points lower than Gload's, and he had only 15 more RBIs while playing in 24 more games. And oh yeah, that's while batting cleanup. Please, oh please bring him in so the runs can start scoring in bunches. Oh and let's not forget, he will probably be worse this year, as he is closing in on 44, and has not had a truly good season since 2004. (Gload just turned 32, by the way.) And if you think pitchers haven't caught on to that you're crazy. There is no way he'll be walked as many times as he has been if he plays another year. So yes, let's sacrifice defense, payroll, and team chemistry for a guy who's going to knock in maybe 25 home runs and 60 RBIs, while batting around .275. And that's being optimistic.

Submitted by jtuck123 on April 26, 2008 - 9:38am.

I don't know if that's what the above comment was, but if it was a sarcastic comment, how can you say you want Barry Bonds here? We are paying Ross Gload 1.3 million which is not too bad for him. We'd be paying more money for Bonds who probably not even match up to Jose Guillen's numbers on the year...Oh well...
JT

Submitted by Otis26 on April 25, 2008 - 11:14am.

Even with the seven game slide we're only 4 games under .500. Every team in our division except Chicago is under .500. We do not have the worst record in baseball.

That's the good news. However, it's time to pull out of the slide...like NOW. Still only 3.5 games out and it's almost May.

I won't deny the offense is anemic. Even if we're a bunch of slap hitters what we need is to string a few hits together. I've noticed that we often don't get a base runner until there are 2 outs. That happened a few times last night in the first game.

I like DeJesus in left, Gathright in center, and Guillen in right. I like Gload but sit him down and rotate Teahen/Gordon/Butler at 1st.

Submitted by griney on April 25, 2008 - 11:07am.

griney
NO BONDS. Lets play the young guys like they said we would. Butler needs to be at 1st base, no questions. Gload is a backup player and needs to be played that way. I was so disapointed watching last nite. Every spring I get pumped and then the games start. We knew the OFFense was going to struggle but the Royals are in the cycle of get hits and lose 9-6, and then get pitching and lose 2-0. I'm sticking with them though. Just like always.
GO ROYALS

Submitted by toddjreynolds on April 25, 2008 - 10:23am.

I'm definitely not desperate enough for Barry, and won't ever be. The team that eventually signs him will be (should be) a team that is on the cusp of a pennant, not toying with a .500 season.

Submitted by CMLachky on April 25, 2008 - 10:21am.

"I'm lonely, but I 'ain't that lonley yet"

Submitted by jcblue42 on April 25, 2008 - 8:49am.

Not that desperate. I'll put up with lackluster performances, screaming curse words at the TV, and knowing that this team will improve. It will. Remember, the core of the team that we are building for the future is under 25 years old. Bret Saberhagen was a fluke for the Royals, 19-20 years old pitching lights out. Hey, this team will be better, I still think we will be 82-80 and finish third in the division.

If Trey can keep from panicking and going through Bob Boone line up changes I think we'll be okay.

Look at the Tigers, did we really think they were going to tank from the beginning and not come around? This game is cyclicle (sp) and I have no doubts. Been a Royals fan all my life, will be one until I die.

Bleed Blue....jcblue42

Submitted by JMGesling on April 25, 2008 - 8:34am.

What would be the point to bring him in. Say for argument sake, that he could come in and hit 25 hrs and 77 RBIs. He would not only be robbing one of our youngsters of ABs (Butler, perhaps Maier or Lubanski), but his salary for that half of a season would probably cost the same as keeping 3 other promising players.

The lack of offense is not fun. We started well, and are showing that we aren't adjusting well. The rest of the league altered their approach.

As for the season, i would like to see a .500 team. I think we can reach that if we steadily improve...which is the most important thing here.

Submitted by kcroyalsguy on April 25, 2008 - 8:46am.

I think Bonds would DH and Butler would move to first. I am not sure how he would take away at bats from guys who are at AAA? As far as the cost, if he was asking for something ridiculous then of course we shouldn't sigh him, only if the cost is right.

Going 500 would be great for this team and signing him would help. Our players need to learn how to win though, the best way to do that is improve or lineup without taking anything away from someone we plan on being a cornerstone of our team.

Submitted by kcroyalsguy on April 25, 2008 - 8:24am.

I see the upside of signing him but would we really want to take at bats away from Miguel Olivo and Ross Gload? We are trying to build for the future here and we need to find out what these two young guys can do. The last thing we need is to sign a DH who can hit. The result is a full season of Billy Butler at first, possibly letting him develop into a MLB average first baseman.

*note: above comment dripping with sarcasm

Submitted by kcroyalsguy on April 25, 2008 - 8:31am.

It is not Gloads fault he made those errors last night. He is such a gamer some of his grit got in his eye. Benching him more in favor of Butler won't happen because it wouldn't be fair to Dougie.

User login

Recent comments

Interviews

Gil Meche: The older brother of the Royals' rotation talks bowling, collecting baseball cards, and sliders

Gil Meche: The older brother of the Royals' rotation talks bowling, collecting baseball cards, and sliders

Very good first-day turnout on Twitter. Thank you. If you're on and haven't found me, I'm at "mellinger." Let's join up, we'll have fun.

You may have noticed we didn't have an MGD update after the weekend, and that's because of a bonus weekend post on SI coverboy/comedian Zack Greinke, and that Davies' start on Thursday means we won't miss a week with an MGD update.

READ MORE...

Submitted by Sam Mellinger on April 28, 2009 - 7:52am.
| read more | 6 comments

Zack Greinke: Ball Star's most requested interview subject talks trucks, fighting, and trash

Zack Greinke, for a lot of reasons, might be the most interesting player on the Royals roster, and this is a team that includes an outfielder who owns lions and ostriches and likes to be slapped in the face, a pitcher who was knighted by his native Aruba, another who works construction in the offseason, and a reliever who body slams opposing players and prides himself on his baking.

Greinke is the most-requested interview for this blog, and if you act now, you can read a bonus interview where Kyle Davies defends himself against what he alleges is Greinke's slander. All in good fun.

READ MORE...

Submitted by Sam Mellinger on March 26, 2009 - 8:41am.
| read more | 11 comments

Army Maj. Michael Lalor: Rooting on the Royals from Iraq

Confession time. That "contest" we ran here
was officially won by Tom Barkwell from Madagascar, and I loved both his words and the fact that he sent them from an island nation in the Indian Ocean, but I gotta tell you, it wasn't my favorite letter.

Nope, my favorite came from Army Maj. Michael Lalor, whose words came from Iraq.

I didn't mention this in the original contest because I wanted to give Michael his own post. He was kind enough to answer some questions over e-mail, which we're turning into the latest interview. His letter is below our e-mail exchange.

READ MORE...

Submitted by Sam Mellinger on September 19, 2008 - 7:07am.
| read more | 12 comments

Royals Gear