Your offseason forecast: not so good, with a chance of frustration

Your offseason forecast: not so good, with a chance of frustration

(Thanks for sticking with us here at Ball Star. I'll have some Chiefs and/or Big 12 football thoughts on UFR soon, but wanted to get this up first.)

There are any number of ways to point out just how bad the Royals are. Their season was disappointing enough that everyone's performance can be criticized*, everyone's security questioned.

* Zack Greinke, Billy Butler, David DeJesus and Joakim Soria are the exceptions. And Alberto Callaspo's hitting.

We can talk about Dave Owen's coaching at third base, Kevin Seitzer's work with an anemic offense, Bob McClure's overseeing a disastrous bullpen, Trey Hillman overseeing the whole operation, Dayton Moore putting it all together, and, of course, each of the players involved.

We'll explore some specific options the Royals have in front of them this offseason, hopefully soon.

But for now, for today, it's worth your attention to check out the Elias Projections update.

These are important numbers because they determine potential compensation for teams that don't re-sign free agents -- flawed as the system may be.

According to the system, these are your "Type A" Royals:

Zack Greinke and Joakim Soria

...and these are your "Type B" Royals:

David DeJesus, Juan Cruz, Yuniesky Betancourt, Gil Meche, Mike Aviles, and Miguel Olivo.

That's it.

This highlights another problem the Royals have, which is that too many of their players are much more valuable to them than any other team.

Some fans want the Royals to trade Mark Teahen, for instance, but on another team he might be just a utility player who bats 7th or so in spot duty. For the Royals, he played 144 games this year, got 571 plate appearances, and often batted fourth or fifth.

Alex Gordon is damaged goods in the evaluations of many teams, but for the Royals, he remains an integral part of their future.

Luke Hochevar finished off a terrible season despite three brilliant outings and may be best suited for middle relief, but for the Royals, he figures to be in the rotation again.

And so on.

This is a big part of the problem as the Royals enter the offseason, problems both self-inflicted and circumstance. The clock is ticking on the team-friendly contract extensions for Greinke and Soria, and on the club-controlled years of Butler's service time.

They also have terribly little money to improve the team, since so much is tied into bad contracts to Jose Guillen, Kyle Farnsworth and others.

Most likely, the Royals will be bad again next summer with the hope of maybe competing in 2011 or 2012, which is the last year of Greinke's contract.

Royals fans deserve better, of course.

There are a few ideas worth exploring this winter, ideas we'll get into on this blog and many more that the Royals' front office will have to consider.

But before we get there, it's good if we all understand where this begins.

Submitted by Sam Mellinger on October 12, 2009 - 6:45am.
| login or register to post comments | thumbnail
Submitted by KCBraves on October 15, 2009 - 9:19pm.

Aviles, Gordon, Guillen, Meche, Bannister, all injured; Soria on the DL part-time, lots of relievers down with injuries; Jacobs getting used to a new league; this team had bad luck.

They're a pretty good team if everyone stays healthy. I look for them to be good next year, even if they don't change much.

I like the manager, coaches, front office; the owner is spending more money; the park is beautiful. My guess is they'll do much better next year and you guys will be jumping on the bandwagon.

Submitted by blahblah on October 14, 2009 - 10:06am.

my off-season wish list: guillen ($12m) and 2-3 decent prospects for beltran ($37m). Enough non-tenders and this could be payroll neutral in 2010! mets save $25m and get prospects, we get carlos back for two years! that would be swell. :)

Submitted by weptiger on October 13, 2009 - 11:30am.

I don't know why the Royals don't just reasonably dump the players they can, i.e. Jacobs, Guillen, etc. and go full bore with the youth movement.

I know it sounds crazy, but until DMGM takes this thing all the way through the burn in phase he is simply treading water with this bunch of misfits, castoffs. Alot of these guys probably wouldn't make other major league rosters. Can a collection of spare parts from the minors be any worse than what they Royals are putting on the field now?

Submitted by eggie on October 13, 2009 - 6:52am.

I'm not willing to give up on the youth, either. But, if the Royals send Jose "Hobble-don't-run" Guillen back into right field, then it will be clear the Royals have given up on youth. Eat the $12 million. Just eat it. No one else in baseball would put that man in their outfield.

I know of several games he cost pitchers because he just flat out can't run!

Plus, he can't hit unless he gets lucky and the ball connects with his upper-cut swing.

Submitted by jtuck123 on October 13, 2009 - 7:29am.

"Plus, he can't hit unless he gets lucky and the ball connects with his upper-cut swing." - You must be talking about Mark Teahen, Mike Jacobs and Jose Guillen...Good thing we never have all three of them in the same lineup...
JT

Submitted by eakers on October 12, 2009 - 6:01pm.

Are the off-season columns going to be the same as the ones during the season?

Since so many players performed below expectations, Jacobs, DeJesus (1st half), Gordon, Cruz, Meche, Mahay, Aviles, etc.

Also, the injuries were terrible, some time not too long ago I saw a list showing the Royals third on number of days missed to DL. The Padres were above, and somebody else. I cannot find where to get this statistic online, I saw it while watching a game.

We were relying on the improvement of many young players which did not happen except for a couple of cases.

Through it all, you are just willing to say that everybody is terrible, there is no chance, Gordon and Hochevar are lost causes, DM and Hillman are the worst ever. Good call... None of it has to do with injuries, players having off years, or young players not improving as much as we hoped.

It is a good thing you are not running things. You need at least some speck of patience when dealing with young players. You want to give up on Hochevar for whatever reason when he did show he some great ability. He has some nasty stuff and seems to have some control issues at times. I recall a Randy Johnson not being good until he turned 30 because of lack of control, or a Chris Carpenter given up on by the Jays. Wandy Rodriguez is another, compare his stats to Hoch's.

Submitted by jimmyc on October 13, 2009 - 2:16am.

You brought it up, not me.

Randy Johnson, 29
19-8, 3.24 ERA, 136 ERA+, 308 K/99 BB

Just as a reminder,
Luke Hochevar, 25
7-13, 6.55 ERA, 67 ERA+, 106 K/46 BB

And, finally, I'll defer to a Poz blog post a few weeks ago: "Since World War II ended there have been 16 pitchers who have made 25 starts in a season and put up an ERA higher than 6.50.

...So what’s the point? Luke Hochevar, of course. He became the 17th pitcher this season."

Yes, he had some extremely good (some might even say, historically good) starts - but his season, on a whole, was historically bad. Let's temper our expectations here. Honestly, I don't think a move to relief would be terrible for Hoch. It's been a truism of managing that you don't write off a starter until you try him as a reliever - not only because he can succeed out of the pen, but often because it provides a confidence boost and eventually a successful return to the rotation. See Greinke, Zack (also, someone I'm optimistic about: Robinson Tejeda).

That said, are we going to give up on Hochevar and Gordon? Of course not. We're already pot committed with those two. Even if they play mediocre/bad/historically bad baseball over the next few seasons, they'll both have MORE than their fair amount of major league time before the Royals finally write them off as busts. That's simply because we have no other option but to hope that they pan out.

Submitted by Jaminrawk on October 12, 2009 - 3:15pm.

A) Unless the young players develop quickly, KC has little shot to compete.

B) Glass DID raise payroll two years in a row and Moore spent it on questionable players. Mainly because no "star" player would even consider Kansas City. Kansas CIty is for reclamation projects and fossils.

C) The Royals have no valuable bargaining chips to make any trades. They aren;t going to dangle Soria Butler or Greinke because we most likely wouldn't get enough back. Plus, they are the guys that bring people to the park. Everyone else, as Sam stated, is a utility guy on most teams.

Unless these draftees hit soon, we're hosed.

Submitted by Huskergut on October 15, 2009 - 9:53pm.

The truth is, they need to trade Grienke and Soria. None of us want to see them do it because it's been so long since we've had a transcendent player wearing a KC uniform that we don't want to give Greinke (or to a lesser extent Soria) up, but if they're serious about rebuilding the franchise, that's the best path they can take.

We all thought going into last year that the team was building to contender status in 2010, but what this past season showed us is that not only is 2010 not realistic, but 2011 is probably out of the question too. The problems going into 2010 -- no money, too many bad contracts, no trade options, have been detailed by Sam, Poz, Dutton, etc., much better than I can. The bottom line is we're left hoping Hochevar, Gordon and someone surprising like Tejeda all have breakout years in 2010. The odds of that happening are extremely slim, and even if it did happen we'd still be miles behind the Yankees and Red Sox, and really we wouldn't even be clearcut favorites in the division. The minor league talent isn't going to arrive in effective fashion until 2011 or 2012, if it arrives at all (Hosmer and Moose were both disappointments this year).

So yeah, I don't want to lose Grienke and Soria either, but the current situation is such that even if all the breaks go our way, the best we'll be during their current contracts is moderately competitive. And then at the end of the agreements we either lose them to free agency or have to trade them at a discount ala Beltran.

But if we bite the bullet and trade them now, we can instantly restock the system with talent at the AAA and/or ML level. Seriously, what would Grienke be worth in today's market, considering his age, freindly contract and performance? I can't think of anybody in the last decade who would be a more valuable commodity. And while Soria wouldn't draw nearly as much, he's still a top closer, which is worth much more to a contender than to a 70 win team.

Anyway, the Process right now looks like it will at best make us "okay" in the next 3 or 4 years before we inevitably lose Grienke. And again, that's only if everything goes our way. I'd say it's more likely we're still floundering three years from now. But even if you believe we can become competitive, that's not really what we ought to be shooting for. Blow up the team, trade the few valuable pieces we have, and you have a chance to start over with an organization stocked with young, inexpensive talent, which is the only way a market like KC can really be competitive. It'd suck, and it would make the fan base irate, but really, they've taken this much abuse over the last 20 years anyway, so what's another couple of disastrous years going to do to them? they're in it for the long haul (even Rany, who'll be back and full of optimism next spring).

Of course, Moore would never do this because he'd be gone before the whole plan came to fruition. And even if he did do it, I'm sure he'd probably trade Greinke for 5 first basemen who can't field, run or take a pitch. But I'm just saying, all things being equal, dealing Grienke and Soria now -- painful as it would be -- is the smart thing to do.

Submitted by stpat on October 17, 2009 - 8:22am.

Huskergut,
You've summed up what I've been saying since late August. The very thought of trading Greinke makes my skin crawl. He's the biggest thing to happen to the Royals since, well, I can't remember. Think about it. Appier, Cone, Sweeney, Damon, Dye, Beltran, none of them compare to the affection that the fans have for Greinke. If he became part of the turnaround and the team just simply became a perennial playoff team, I predict he would be loved equally as much as Brett or White.

However, the sad thing is that there is another option. Glass could realize that he already has the building blocks in Greinke, Soria & Butler (& perhaps 1 or 2 others that haven't emerged yet) to go out and spend some real money on real players while we still have them under contracts. Doing so could convince Greinke & Soria that the organization is serious & may garner a 'hometown' discount that might allow Glass to re-sign one or both of them. Also, over the 3-5 year 'spending spree' the team's minor league system would be replenishing to the point that when the FA contracts ran out, they, theoretically, would have the influx of new, cheap talent from the minors to replace the players we lose to free agency. If Moore does his job and continues to stock the minors with talent, the franchise could be recovered to the point that it could sustain success with a middle tier payroll like the Twins for instance. Problem solved.

Alas, this requires Glass to take a RISK and spend money out of his own pocket for several years to help repair the disaster he created over the last 15 years. Since that is unlikely to happen because he is a cheap bastard, the option of selling Greinke & Soria now while their value is high may, unfortunately for long suffering Royals fans, be the only way to turn the inevitable into something positive.

A prediction: Moore & Glass know that selling Greinke off, say, at next year's trade deadline would effectively destroy any credibility ownership has made with a long suffering fan base. They therefore, allow Greinke to remain with the club through 2011 hoping (as usual) that Greinke will do them another favor & take less than the market price for the pleasure of missing out on the playoffs & personal accolades. After no extension is agreed upon, Moore will shop Greinke at the trade deadline & trade him for the 2012 equivalent of Mark Teahen, John Buck & Mike Wood. Glass will then claim he did the best he could and cry poor-pitiful me & indirectly blame baseball economics & player greed for another lost player to free agency. And the cycle of ineptitude & cheap bargain basement baseball continues.

GOD, please deliver us from David Glass.

Submitted by Rocketman on October 12, 2009 - 1:26pm.

You can criticize Seitzer, McClure and Hillman if you want, but other than Mike Jacobs and the players felled by injury everyone else met or exceeded their PECOTA projections...garbage in, garbage out.

Submitted by smenze on October 12, 2009 - 10:16am.

Just based on last seasons opening day payroll and assuming a 5% increase in payroll, the Royals could have as much as $18 million to play with. While this is not completely accurate because the payroll increased another 7% during the season, it was easiest to look at the opening day numbers. Here is how they can do it. Non-tender/buy out every contract they can. The buy outs are all under performing players anyways based on VoRP.

Submitted by jimmyc on October 14, 2009 - 3:38am.

...is that the Royals can't view VORP the same way other teams can, because our upper minor leagues are so bereft of talent in most areas (exception: KK) that we just don't have those replacement-level guys available.

User login

Recent comments

Interviews

Gil Meche: The older brother of the Royals' rotation talks bowling, collecting baseball cards, and sliders

Gil Meche: The older brother of the Royals' rotation talks bowling, collecting baseball cards, and sliders

Very good first-day turnout on Twitter. Thank you. If you're on and haven't found me, I'm at "mellinger." Let's join up, we'll have fun.

You may have noticed we didn't have an MGD update after the weekend, and that's because of a bonus weekend post on SI coverboy/comedian Zack Greinke, and that Davies' start on Thursday means we won't miss a week with an MGD update.

READ MORE...

Submitted by Sam Mellinger on April 28, 2009 - 7:52am.
| read more | 6 comments

Zack Greinke: Ball Star's most requested interview subject talks trucks, fighting, and trash

Zack Greinke, for a lot of reasons, might be the most interesting player on the Royals roster, and this is a team that includes an outfielder who owns lions and ostriches and likes to be slapped in the face, a pitcher who was knighted by his native Aruba, another who works construction in the offseason, and a reliever who body slams opposing players and prides himself on his baking.

Greinke is the most-requested interview for this blog, and if you act now, you can read a bonus interview where Kyle Davies defends himself against what he alleges is Greinke's slander. All in good fun.

READ MORE...

Submitted by Sam Mellinger on March 26, 2009 - 8:41am.
| read more | 11 comments

Army Maj. Michael Lalor: Rooting on the Royals from Iraq

Confession time. That "contest" we ran here
was officially won by Tom Barkwell from Madagascar, and I loved both his words and the fact that he sent them from an island nation in the Indian Ocean, but I gotta tell you, it wasn't my favorite letter.

Nope, my favorite came from Army Maj. Michael Lalor, whose words came from Iraq.

I didn't mention this in the original contest because I wanted to give Michael his own post. He was kind enough to answer some questions over e-mail, which we're turning into the latest interview. His letter is below our e-mail exchange.

READ MORE...

Submitted by Sam Mellinger on September 19, 2008 - 7:07am.
| read more | 12 comments

Royals Gear