Juan Cruz's stunning fall is in its 9th week -- time for a non-explanation from Ball Star

Juan Cruz's stunning fall is in its 9th week -- time for a non-explanation from Ball Star

Juan Cruz is really bad right now. Seriously. Very, very, very bad. Even by the Royals-of-the-21st-century standards, he's going really bad right now.

You can see it in these numbers: 22 innings, 22 earned runs, 12 walks, 28 hits since May 21.

Or you can see is in this anecdote: after his latest bomb last night, two guys who follow the Royals and know baseball said some variation of, "Cruz has to be hurt, right?"

I am no sleuth. I'm not even all that smart. If you read this blog often enough, you know that already.

But there has to be some reason that Cruz has gone from electric, dominating, overpowering 8th inning guy -- he struck out 158 batters in 112 2/3 innings the last two seasons in Arizona -- to something more resembling Albie Lopez.

There just has to be something, right? Something other than manager Trey Hillman's assertion that it's just location?

We hear so much about his dominating slider, I figured that thing had to have flattened out, or maybe his fastball velocity has depressed. Gotta be something, right?

So here's what I did. Used the Pitch f/x data on MLB.com's really cool Gameday feature to compare Cruz's best outing of the year* and his worst**.

* 2 innings, three strikeouts, no walks, no runs on April 14 against the Indians.

** 1/3 inning, no strikeouts, one walk, three hits, three earned runs last night against the Angels.

Gameday's Pitch f/x kicks out what it calls "break" and "Pitch f/x value." Break is defined as the greatest distance between the trajectory of a pitch at any point and the straight line path from the release point. A Barry Zito curveball will have a big Break value.

Pitch f/x value is defined as the distance between the location of the actual pitch and the calculated location of a ball thrown by the pitcher in the same way with no spin.

There are certainly reasons that what you're about to read is not the definitive analysis on this, starting with the fact that I only looked at two games, but here's what I found:

Cruz threw seven sliders on April 14, ranging from 79 to 83 mph, 8 to 10 inches of Break, and 4 to 6 inches of Pitch f/x value.

He threw five sliders last night, ranging from 80 to 83 mph, 8 to 9 inches of Break, and 6 to 10 inches of Pitch f/x value.

Cruz threw 15 fastballs on April 14, ranging from 93 to 96 mph, 3 to 5 inches of Break, and 11 to 16 inches of Pitch f/x value.

He threw nine fastballs last night, ranging from 92 to 96 mph, 4 to 6 inches of Break, and 13 to 15 inches of Pitch f/x value.

It's virtually identical, save for extra PFX value on his slider last night, and really, the 10-incher is the outlier -- the other four were from 6 to 8 inches.

So, well, Pitch f/x apparently has no idea what's going on, which means I don't either.

Maybe Trey's right. The "stuff" is apparently the same. Maybe it's just location, which may point more to a mental problem than physical.

If only this was the Royals' biggest problem.

Submitted by Sam Mellinger on July 21, 2009 - 10:02pm.
| login or register to post comments | thumbnail | original
Submitted by kcazmatt on July 22, 2009 - 5:53pm.

hey, at least the Chiefs don't have to worry about KC fans spending too much money at the K that they can't afford to go to Arrowhead

Submitted by graypoopon on July 22, 2009 - 12:10pm.

"Most pitchers that go from the NL to the AL have worse stats than they did in the NL. And most pitchers that go from the AL to the NL suddenly look a whole lot better."

...we have Zito, Barry.

Submitted by BDarn on July 22, 2009 - 9:32am.

that they can only lose 16 games total and just one per week. The Royals, however can lose a whole lot more than 16 total and can lose 7 in a week, like theey just did (8 in a row and counting).
Other than that, there isn't a whole lot different between these 2 pathetic teams.

Submitted by jtuck123 on July 22, 2009 - 10:46am.

In the Royals defense, their winning percentage (as bad as it's been the past few years) has been better than the Cheifs in the past 2 years...
JT

Submitted by plivvy on July 22, 2009 - 11:14am.

You managed to come up with a positive sentence that included the words "Royals" and "defense" for the first time all year! I really didn't think it was possible...
Paul L.

Submitted by cpass on July 22, 2009 - 8:39am.

It seemed to me that Cruz has been throwing more change-ups than I expected to see from a guy who was reputed to be a fastball-slider type of pitcher, so I finally looked it up. He threw his change 4.5% of the time last year, 5.9% in 2007. This year? 14.1%. Now, I haven't dug deeply enough into PitchFX to determine whether that's the pitch that's hurting him, but to my eyes it sure is. The ones I've seen him throw since the break are just getting pounded because he IS putting them in bad locations - so Hillman is somewhat right about that one. Why has he fallen in love with the change all of a sudden?

Submitted by CMLachky on July 22, 2009 - 8:09am.

Are we going to have a mid-season Over/Under update soon??

Submitted by Muley05 on July 22, 2009 - 8:07am.

Cruz also went from the NL (inferior league) to the AL (superior league). That has to account for some of his regression this year.

Most pitchers that go from the NL to the AL have worse stats than they did in the NL. And most pitchers that go from the AL to the NL suddenly look a whole lot better.

For an example, see Bronson Arroyo. He was terrible with the Red Sox a few years ago, and the next year in Cincy he was in the hunt for the Cy Young award.

Submitted by curtisruder on July 22, 2009 - 7:50am.

I think that Cruz is just having a regression to the mean kind of season.

There was an interesting tidbit in Bill James Gold Mine about Cruz. (I am citing this from memory, so I may not have it exactly right, but I have the gist of it anyway.)

Last season, Cruz averaged over 19 pitches per inning and had a sub-2 ERA. Every other pitcher in all of baseball who averaged 19 pitches per inning had an ERA over 4.

Now it could be that Cruz has something completely unique in all of baseball that allowed him to throw so many pitches without giving up runs. Or it could be a run of good luck.

One of the problems of evaluating relievers is that we have such small sample sizes compared to starting pitchers. It will take a reliever 3 or 4 years to accumulate the innings that a rotation mainstay will have in one year. And so there is just more variation in performance because of that smaller sample size.

I think Cruz really is just a reliever who should have an ERA around 4 to 4.5. He had a nice run the last couple of years, but it was largely due to chance. I also think he is just having a bad run right now. He isn't as good as his numbers would indicate for 2007-2008, and he isn't as bad as his 2009 numbers.

Submitted by Otis26 on July 22, 2009 - 6:39am.

Depends on your context but here are a couple to consider:

1. Fan apathy. Those of us who are fairly 'hard core' fans will eventually get through the anger phase and fall into apathy. As that continues attendance will drop even more and revenue at the stadium will plummet.

2. Chiefs mini-camp. As miserable as the Royals are the Chiefs are right there with them (or were)...but at least they are something new to lament about. Our focus will shift.

3. Trading deadline in 9 days. We've heard rumors of interest in Teahen but for the most part Betancourt may have been our big move this year. Yay?

Submitted by jtuck123 on July 22, 2009 - 8:45am.

I believe I've fallen into apathy...After getting great seats to last nights game (the 7:45 one) I preceeded to watch 6 innings of decent baseball. Follow that up with a 7 run inning and I'm done. I don't care if the Royals lose 100+ games this year. In fact, I expect it. In my opinion, this team is on the verge of being the worst team in the history of baseball. As much as it pains me to say it, let's get this season over with and watch some football...
JT

Submitted by thebaseballfish on July 22, 2009 - 7:48pm.

Whoa JT ... ease up on that one and take a look at the Washington Nationals. As bad as the Royals have been, their winning percentage of 0.398 is 100 points better than the Nats 0.298. To top it off, the Nats play in the NL and still can't win. 2008 KC won 16 more games than WAS.

The Royals absolutely suck right now, but they are no where close to the worst team in the history of baseball. There have been a LOT of clunkers throughout the last 130+ years.

I don't say this to defend the Royals, just trying to keep things in proper perspective. There is a long road from Royally sucking (pun intended) to worst in history.

User login

Recent comments

Interviews

Gil Meche: The older brother of the Royals' rotation talks bowling, collecting baseball cards, and sliders

Gil Meche: The older brother of the Royals' rotation talks bowling, collecting baseball cards, and sliders

Very good first-day turnout on Twitter. Thank you. If you're on and haven't found me, I'm at "mellinger." Let's join up, we'll have fun.

You may have noticed we didn't have an MGD update after the weekend, and that's because of a bonus weekend post on SI coverboy/comedian Zack Greinke, and that Davies' start on Thursday means we won't miss a week with an MGD update.

READ MORE...

Submitted by Sam Mellinger on April 28, 2009 - 7:52am.
| read more | 6 comments

Zack Greinke: Ball Star's most requested interview subject talks trucks, fighting, and trash

Zack Greinke, for a lot of reasons, might be the most interesting player on the Royals roster, and this is a team that includes an outfielder who owns lions and ostriches and likes to be slapped in the face, a pitcher who was knighted by his native Aruba, another who works construction in the offseason, and a reliever who body slams opposing players and prides himself on his baking.

Greinke is the most-requested interview for this blog, and if you act now, you can read a bonus interview where Kyle Davies defends himself against what he alleges is Greinke's slander. All in good fun.

READ MORE...

Submitted by Sam Mellinger on March 26, 2009 - 8:41am.
| read more | 11 comments

Army Maj. Michael Lalor: Rooting on the Royals from Iraq

Confession time. That "contest" we ran here
was officially won by Tom Barkwell from Madagascar, and I loved both his words and the fact that he sent them from an island nation in the Indian Ocean, but I gotta tell you, it wasn't my favorite letter.

Nope, my favorite came from Army Maj. Michael Lalor, whose words came from Iraq.

I didn't mention this in the original contest because I wanted to give Michael his own post. He was kind enough to answer some questions over e-mail, which we're turning into the latest interview. His letter is below our e-mail exchange.

READ MORE...

Submitted by Sam Mellinger on September 19, 2008 - 7:07am.
| read more | 12 comments

Royals Gear