The arguments that your arguments for firing Trey Hillman are stupid

The arguments that your arguments for firing Trey Hillman are stupid

When a throwaway line in yesterday's post that has nothing to do with the main point -- Zack Greinke -- generates the bulk of the comments, it's probably best to address what's on your mind.

A lot of you are frustrated, and that's fine, you should be. These were real hopes you had in spring training, fanned by an 18-11 start that had people in Kansas City dreaming in the clouds.

That's all gone now, of course, and someone needs to take the blame. Rany, in an interesting post that ignores some critical facts, wants the trainer to be blamed.

At least a vocal minority want that someone to be Trey Hillman. I don't want to spend this morning rehashing the same arguments, on each side.

I just want to point out that calling for Trey's job ignores the following:

* Most of us thought this was a maybe .500 team that, if everything fell right, could compete in a weak division. Everything has fallen wrong, and the important stuff has been out of Trey's control.

* There were three guys so important to the team that we said any major injury or underperformance would be a dealbreaker for the Royals this season. Zack has obviously been more than good. But Gil Meche has battled back problems, and Joakim Soria's shoulder injury threw the entire bullpen into a mess for more than a month.

* After the big three, the next most important pitcher was Kyle Davies. He is now in the minor leagues.

* The face of the offseason acquisitions was Coco Crisp, who is out for the year.

* The position player perhaps most critical to the Royals' success this year was Mike Aviles. He was hitting .183 before going to the DL, where he'll apparently be for a while.

* Alex Gordon, whose breakout season could've been a catalyst to an exciting summer, is just now beginning a rehab assignment for a serious hip injury.

* John Buck is on the disabled list.

* David DeJesus has underperformed. Same with Jose Guillen and Mike Jacobs.

Now, injuries are part of the game. Nobody feels any sympathy, and they shouldn't. This is the big leagues. Don't give us excuses, just give us results.

Please don't take any of this to mean that Trey's doing a knockout job. He's not. He's the manager of a team playing .326 ball over the last almost eight weeks, so by the definition of the job, he's not doing well.

There are little things here and there that we all see he could do better with, and probably some big things, too.

But all he's really proved this season is that he can't win as the manager of a team that had very little margin for error to start with, and then proceeds to be decimated by injuries and key underperformances.

Submitted by Sam Mellinger on June 30, 2009 - 8:20am.
| login or register to post comments | thumbnail
Submitted by tgeary20 on July 4, 2009 - 12:56pm.

It's pretty obvious to me what Trey did in Japan hasn't and won't duplicate itself here in the US. Why? Because this is America's sport, you know, apple pie and all...the baseball players here in the US are part of a long, rich tradition and aren't fooled by a guy that respects the samurai, follow?
Look, bottom line, his players don't respect him and so on. Fire him, anytime..this season, just have a manager in there in time for next season. Sometimes you can't really peg ceratain things about somebody, but the easiest is the condition this baseball team is in and the look on Treys' face, like a deer in the headlights. Tim G

Submitted by Isaac on July 3, 2009 - 2:20am.

Sam, denial is not just a river in Africa. You mentioned things that have happened that were out of his control and you mentioned things that he has done poorly. Why don't you come up with one or two things that he has done well. I don't think everyone of the injuries were out of his control as Rany has mentioned. It's impossible to know how much of it he had in his control but based on how they went about each injury, it's hard to believe at least some of it wasn't.

This team continues to make mental errors on the field some of which show their face in the form of physical errors. He continues to make or not make moves that no one including yourself can understand. I don't place all the blame on him as DM deserves his share of it as well for even picking up a guy like Jacobs or Farnsworth or HoRam.

The first one to go is usually the manager. I say the sooner we start the better.

Submitted by curtisruder on June 30, 2009 - 11:01pm.

I sort of understand the bizarre confluence of events that has our roster left with what seems like six middle infielders who are decent with the glove and terrible with the bat. We have had injuries throughout the system in the outfield, and so on.

So while I would normally think it inexcusable to have TPJ, the Spork, Hernandez, and Hulett all on the same roster, well, it is what we have. It is a big reason we suck right now, but the path that got us here over the last couple of months is what it is.

But when you have a whole series of mediocre bats and decent gloves, how is it that you send the worst bat to the plate with two outs and the bases loaded. I can understand the rationale of putting your best glove and worst bat in there. The one redeeming feature of having all of these guys is that none of them should be at the plate during a big at bat. We had to use Guillen there, or Brayan, or somebody, anybody who hits better than a mediocre national league pitcher.

TPJ had a startingly good at bat, taking 13 pitches to strike out if I remember right. But this is the kind of crap that drives me crazy. There are plenty of games where we don't really know when the key plays are happening until we look back at the whole game. But how freaking hard is it to tell that bases loaded and two outs in a tie game is a key moment?

And so I am left with this sequence of thoughts ... if he doesn't know that this is a key moment, he is not up to this job. And if he knows that it is a key moment, and still sends Pena to the plate with several other options for shortstop already in the game and on the bench, well, he is not up to the job.

Submitted by kcroyals on July 2, 2009 - 8:41pm.

TPJ did not have a startlingly good at bat. Watching the pitchfx on gameday, one could see that he was thrown the EXACT same pitch, like, 8 times in a row: a 91 mph fastball in the upper part of the strike zone. And he could not hit the ball squarely a single time. Normally, it's great when a hitter makes a pitcher work. But it seemed pretty obvious that TPJ was getting batting practice pitches and could not handle them. I've seen this notion--that TPJ had a good at-bat with the bases loaded even though he struck out--a couple places on the internets. It simply is not true. He had a terrible at bat. He got the same juicy fastball over and over and over and over and over again. And he struck out. With the bases loaded. If that's greatness we Royals fans are truly deprived.

Submitted by bfos7215 on July 1, 2009 - 8:00am.

Even if you accept the major unsupported stretch that all of these major issues were out of the hands of the manager, you're only using those injuries as an excuse to be allowed to ignore how bad of a manager Hillman is. Even if Dayton Moore and Nick Swartz are terrible at their jobs, that doesn't absolve Trey from doing his job so poorly.

Submitted by jtuck123 on June 30, 2009 - 12:41pm.

Is there maybe a post coming up about what Jim Souhan said about the Kansas City Royals playing like an older version of the Lansing Lugnuts? If you haven't read the article in the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, you should definitely look it up. And they say that there's a bunch of "good people" up in Minnesota...
JT

Submitted by bfos7215 on June 30, 2009 - 12:53pm.

Are they not playing like an older version of the Lansing Lugnuts?

Submitted by jtuck123 on July 1, 2009 - 10:43am.

...everyone knows it, but doesn't say anything about it. Kansas City's sports writers can say stuff about it, but I don't think it's kosher for a divisional opponents sports writer to rail on the Royals like that...
JT

Submitted by DCRoyal on June 30, 2009 - 12:38pm.

So why keep him on? Granted, I agree that firing him now doesn't accomplish anything, but why give Trey another chance after this season? What does he bring to the table that other managers don't have? Experience in Japan? That's it, really. The only fruits of that experience we have seen are the Yabuta signing and some odd bunting situations. Both of those apples are rotten.

Sam, I respect your opinion, but the bottom line is I don’t understand what about Trey Hillman is defensible. How do you even feel passionate about the guy? He’s impossible for me to defend in any way because he’s just so damn uninspiring. Trey has proven to be a mediocre manager, plain and simple. In his tenure, he’s been the equivalent of two years of interim Bob Schaeffer or John Mizerock. He has no character other than being a mediocre dude with a long Texas drawl, and I know ton of those guys personally. He's come close to losing the clubhouse multiple times. None of his players seem to be passionate about him. He comes across as unintelligent, even aloof at times, with the media.

Most of all, he has not put a stamp on the franchise in any way whatsoever. Say what you want about Bob Boone, Hal McRae, Tony Pena, Buddy Bell, and Tony Muser but at least they had some fire to their tenures. At least they tried some things that were strange, that showed they were desperately trying to cling to life on a sinking ship, even if their actions were not necessarily inspirational or helpful to the team in any way. Trey’s injected no life into the Royals franchise. And if you’re not going to inject life in the franchise, you need to be a master tactician, and he is the farthest thing from that since Buddy Bell. So essentially, Trey brings NOTHING new to the table from a managerial perspective.

When it comes down to it, he’s just a dude who happened to manage in Japan. That might sound awesome to some people, but we’ve learned that it’s really not. Whatever benefits were thought to be gained from his hire were flushed down the toilet somewhere between signing Yasuhiko Yabuta and hitting Mike Jacobs against a LH starter for the 25th time this season. I honestly have no idea how Trey was such a big thing in Japan. Don’t they go for extreme character guys like Bobby V.? John Gibbons has more fire and character than Hillman.

Trey is just Trey in every sense of the word. Nothing special, just an average employee who comes in to work every day to tread water and doesn't learn from his mistakes. So why hold on to him any longer than necesssary? Give him walking papers after the season.

Submitted by cbrett42 on July 1, 2009 - 12:23pm.

In you third paragraph, you complain that Trey Hillman hasn't done anything to show that he's "desperately trying to cling to life on a sinking ship." Are you suggesting that you think he should be fired, but that if he jumps into the shower with his uniform on, you'll reconsider? Even if it was not necessarily inspirational or helpful to the team in any way?

Submitted by bfos7215 on June 30, 2009 - 10:46am.

If it's not the trainer and it's not Trey, who, then, is responsible for the God-awful handling of injured players? Who is responsible for letting Meche throw his arm off after already showing major concerns around his stamina and back? Who is pitching Soria on consecutive nights unnecessarily when he wasn't available the night before when we needed him most? Who was moving Crisp in and out of the lineup asking him to play through injury?

Normally, the man in control of all of these things (and so much more we've all seen covered) is the manager. Maybe that's not the case here, and Trey is innocent. But, it's pretty lazy commentary to blast the criticisms of Trey as "stupid" when you aren't explaining why these complaints, which usually land at the managers feet, are, in this case, misplaced.

Submitted by jtuck123 on June 30, 2009 - 11:05am.

...for Meche, Crisp, Guillen and probably Soria, the answer is themselves. Gil wanted to pitch the 9th even though Trey had hinted at getting him replaced for the 9th. Crisp felt that he could play through his injury and probably ended up hurting himself more. Guillen thinks he's Superman and he's lucky that he's not hurt worse...Believe it or not, the Royals need his bat in the lineup. As for Soria, I didn't hear anything on who was behind his injuries, but I'm sure he had something to do with it too.

I don't think that players enjoy being on the DL. They want, more than anything, to be out on the field helping their team win. Unfortunately, for players like Mike Aviles and Coco Crisp, they don't let their managers know when they physically can't play...
JT

Submitted by ribman on July 2, 2009 - 11:18pm.

You have no idea of what you are talking about. You can't just make stuff up.
It's been established that Crisp had a rather minor injury requiring a few days rest and was told to play through it and the end result was a major injury- (hint even his arm is not that bad)
Soria - hello? remember the headlines where he said he was hurt and our manager and Gm were quoted as saying "He needs to learn to pitch through pain and he's not really hurt"
Guess what he was really hurt!
Mike Aviles played with an injury and now may never be able to play SS again
Gil Meche- want my source for a dead arm- try the man's blog you are reading -

Are you speaking with these players every night or are these conversations in your head as I suspect most social activity occurs for you- btw it's the managers job to make decisions not the players- it doesn't matter if Gil Meche wanted to stay in- 99% of the other managers take him out - it was a horrible long term decision and a bad short term decision- leaving him in cost us runs- he was done

Please don't make things up and actually spend a few minutes reading what is public knowledge -I'll make it easy on you- start with reading Mellingers blog since you have such a problem with our replies maybe it will click when you read the same thing from him.

Submitted by jtuck123 on July 3, 2009 - 11:59am.

You are God. Welcome to your universe. Starting here.

Crisp's arm isn't that bad, right? Just a torn labrum...no biggie. That just requires 9 months of recovery.

I still want to know where Meche's dead arm is? He might of had it during the week, but we didn't see any of that. The dude pitched great on Wednesday. His fastball "touched 96" in the 6th inning. Dead. Gone. Justin Timberlake.

And then we have wonderful quotes like this one..."Are you speaking with these players every night or are these conversations in your head as I suspect most social activity occurs for you- btw it's the managers job to make decisions not the players- it doesn't matter if Gil Meche wanted to stay in- 99% of the other managers take him out - it was a horrible long term decision and a bad short term decision- leaving him in cost us runs- he was done" - First off, it's like the longest run on sentence ever. English, it's a great language. Sad part is, there are way too many people who can't use it correctly. Secondly, no, I don't speak with the players. Then again, I don't sit down with the Glass family every night for dinner either. You one-up'd me there...And yes, I'm 45 years old and I sit in my parents basement with my 8 computers (half of which I play World of Warcraft and every other ridiculous game on) and eat Hot Pockets. I don't have a life. Obviously...

As for baseball, which is actually what this entire blog is about, Gil Meche is a big boy now. He's a veteran. He can tell a 2nd year manager that he wants to go in for another inning. Now, that second year manager can do whatever he wants and he respected the veteran. I'm under the impression that it's Gil's fault that he threw 132 pitches. Trey did what a 2nd year MLB manager would do. The game that he pitched 132 pitches was a complete game shutout, he gave up 0 runs in the "short term". He pitched terrible the next game (9 ER in 3&1/3) and gave up 4 runs in 5 innings the start after that. But Wednesday, the day that Sam was talking about in his "dead arm" post, Meche pitched 121 pitches and gave up 2 runs. Meche's arm might have been dead the previous 2 starts, but the last start was no "dead arm" pitching.

"Please don't make things up and actually spend a few minutes reading what is public knowledge" - I'm telling you man, get on SI.com, baseballprospectus.com, MLB.com...look up my stats. They're accurate. Promise.
JT

Submitted by gsports4 on June 30, 2009 - 11:53am.

That the manager and the head trainer are paid to be big boys, and not be afraid to MANAGE the players. If the trainer was competent, he would investigate these ailments more thoroughly, whether the players wanted them to or not. He would then voice his results to the manager, who would tell the player he was getting rest, or going to the DL, whether he wanted to or not. Good employees are going to want to keep producing and doing their job. If they are not, and they need help to get back to peak performance, it is up to the management to make them get it.

Submitted by bfos7215 on June 30, 2009 - 12:52pm.

...and maybe, for some strange reason, Trey doesn't have the power to over-rule those players. But, if a reporter is going to insist that the manager is not at fault for failures that are typically the responsibility of the manager, that reporter sure as heck better explain why this particular situation is so different. Without doing that, calling criticisms of managerial responsibilities "stupid" is rather lazy and irresponsible.

Submitted by jtuck123 on June 30, 2009 - 12:06pm.

...I was just answering the question of who's fault some of these injuries were...Trey shouldn't have let Meche pitch the ninth. Period. No excuses. But with injuries like Aviles', if your player doesn't say anything about it, who's problem is it? It's their own dumb fault. Good luck getting Guillen to do anything HE doesn't want to do...
JT

Submitted by curtisruder on June 30, 2009 - 10:28am.

I think you misinterpret Rany. I don't think he thinks Schwartz should be blamed for this season's bad start. He explicitly says ...

I’m not naïve enough to think that all of the Royals’ injury woes are the fault of Swartz, or that after firing him the team’s DL will magically empty. I’m sure that you can find some reason to absolve Swartz for every individual incident I’ve mentioned above.

If you want to address his argument, by all means do so. But it is an argument that is based upon nearly 20 years of injuries, and not just the last three months. It is low brow to say that there are critical facts without providing any critical facts. But you misrepresent his argument, and then attempt to discredit the strawman with a wink.

That is weak sauce, and you are better than that.

Now, as to your main point, I agree that it is difficult to get a gauge on Hillman for this first half. My thought was that if Gordon and Butler weren't hitting three and four everyday in some order by this time, we were going to be looking at a long season. So when Gordon went down for most of the year, I pretty much wrote off our chances to win the division over the long haul.

That said, a manager's job is to get the best performance possible out of his players. You list a whole bunch of guys underperforming. Who is over-performing? The Spork, for sure, and Callaspo has had more extra base hits than I would have expected. Greinke has been other-worldly. Butler has been good, but basically in line with expectations.

So you have a somewhat mixed bag. So I give Hillman a gentleman's C at this point. Not enough to fire him, but certainly not safe, either.

Submitted by lakewoodroyal on June 30, 2009 - 10:10am.

"...of a team that had very little margin for error to start with, and then proceeds to be decimated by injuries and key underperformances."

Therein lies the problem. And will continue to be a problem unless this team makes serious improvement in personnel. All injuries aside, at some point DM needs to stop being patient with guys who are consistently...inconsistent. It does no good to surround average young big leaguers with even MORE average (and underperforming) veteran free agents with flaws to their game or are past their prime - just for the sake of cheaper contracts.

Right now, the best players on the team are average, at-best, compared to the rest of the league. Each of them has had at least one season or half-season or projected crap from their minor league days that makes our front office continue to wait around for them to become great. The franchise pays DM to make very hard decisions regarding situations like this. If quality improvements aren't made, you can not only expect this team to be a continued let-down in the future, but you can also add Moore's name to the firing line.

Submitted by TheWiz on June 30, 2009 - 9:36am.

Every time I hear Frank White go in detail during a Royals broadcast about what he would do in a particular situation, I always wonder why he is not the manager. He has to be the next in line. It seems like he is just waiting until Trey is out.

Submitted by cpass on June 30, 2009 - 9:31am.

Your crystal ball was flawless during the preseason, when you stated that if anything happened to Greinke, Meche, and/or Soria there would be problems, and that the performances of Aviles and Davies would be pivotal to the team. You were absolutely correct and my hat is off to you.

Honestly, I can't properly assess Trey Hillman at this point, and I don't think it's fair for anybody to try. Everything that could go wrong this year has, and it's not his fault that the guys he has to fill in are replacement-level (or worse). I'm not sold on him yet, but he hasn't done anything that has me calling for his head either.

Submitted by popester on June 30, 2009 - 8:52am.

But sometimes its in the best interest of both parties to just move on. Sports history is full of examples where a coach and team fail miserably with each other, they both go their separate ways, and both are better for it.

Unfortunately the Royals have a losing mentality in the clubhouse. Its not Trey's fault, but its going to be hard to change it. The easiest way to get rid of that mentality is to mix things up dramatically by bringing in a new manager.

Its not fair to Trey, but life often isn't...

Submitted by Karte on June 30, 2009 - 9:07am.

How do you know that there is a "losing mentality" in the clubhouse? Are you a player, manager, or trainer? Have you been in the clubhouse before or after games?

Submitted by plivvy on June 30, 2009 - 9:23am.

...I don't necessarily think the Royals have a "losing mentality." Even now, and especially at the beginning of the year, they had a swagger that they expected to win. Of course some of that swagger has gone away, but that doesn't mean they have a losing mentality. Simply because a team has a penchant for losing doesn't mean that is their mentality.

And firing managers is rarely, if ever, the actual answer. Trey does some odd things and does so fairly frequently. That doesn't mean he deserves to be fired (especially in his second year). No doubt the Royals have improved since he has been the manager, and they continue to show signs of being a legit baseball team. If they aren't a playoff team by the time Moustakas and Hosmer are ready to come up (probably 2012) then let's talk about firing him.
Paul L.

User login

Recent comments

Interviews

Gil Meche: The older brother of the Royals' rotation talks bowling, collecting baseball cards, and sliders

Gil Meche: The older brother of the Royals' rotation talks bowling, collecting baseball cards, and sliders

Very good first-day turnout on Twitter. Thank you. If you're on and haven't found me, I'm at "mellinger." Let's join up, we'll have fun.

You may have noticed we didn't have an MGD update after the weekend, and that's because of a bonus weekend post on SI coverboy/comedian Zack Greinke, and that Davies' start on Thursday means we won't miss a week with an MGD update.

READ MORE...

Submitted by Sam Mellinger on April 28, 2009 - 7:52am.
| read more | 6 comments

Zack Greinke: Ball Star's most requested interview subject talks trucks, fighting, and trash

Zack Greinke, for a lot of reasons, might be the most interesting player on the Royals roster, and this is a team that includes an outfielder who owns lions and ostriches and likes to be slapped in the face, a pitcher who was knighted by his native Aruba, another who works construction in the offseason, and a reliever who body slams opposing players and prides himself on his baking.

Greinke is the most-requested interview for this blog, and if you act now, you can read a bonus interview where Kyle Davies defends himself against what he alleges is Greinke's slander. All in good fun.

READ MORE...

Submitted by Sam Mellinger on March 26, 2009 - 8:41am.
| read more | 11 comments

Army Maj. Michael Lalor: Rooting on the Royals from Iraq

Confession time. That "contest" we ran here
was officially won by Tom Barkwell from Madagascar, and I loved both his words and the fact that he sent them from an island nation in the Indian Ocean, but I gotta tell you, it wasn't my favorite letter.

Nope, my favorite came from Army Maj. Michael Lalor, whose words came from Iraq.

I didn't mention this in the original contest because I wanted to give Michael his own post. He was kind enough to answer some questions over e-mail, which we're turning into the latest interview. His letter is below our e-mail exchange.

READ MORE...

Submitted by Sam Mellinger on September 19, 2008 - 7:07am.
| read more | 12 comments

Royals Gear