Jose Guillen's in the news again, calling his team "horse (bleep)," for certain baserunning mistakes and what he sees as a tendency to give up leads late.
This is somewhat the same thing he said in Sunday's paper.
When I talked to Guillen, he was especially upset about the late leads, and this was on Saturday, a day after they gave it up on Friday night, so the frustration was no doubt amplified.
Guillen is a lot of things, but he is not someone who's going to back down from most anything he says, so when a group of reporters asked him about it on Monday he said many of the same things.
Most all of what Guillen says has merit, with the exception of the bit about the late leads. According to Baseball Reference, which is where all the following stats come from, the Royals are 19-8 (.704) when leading after four innings, 23-7 (.767) after five, 25-4 (.862) after six, 28-3 (.903) after seven, and 31-1 (.969) after eight.
But when Guillen talks about not playing a complete nine innings, about getting some of the job done and then letting up, I think part of what he's referring to is the team's problems with two outs.
I could be putting words in his mouth with that, but I think that's part of it. Or maybe I'm projecting my thoughts onto him, who knows.
Either way, the numbers absolutely back it. As Guillen might say, the Royals' pitching and defense (stinks) with two outs.
Entering Monday (when the Rockies scored their first three runs with two outs) the Royals had given up 152 runs with two outs.
That's third in all of baseball, behind only Pittsburgh (158) and Texas (157), and we can all agree neither place is the standard of measurement for a franchise trying to build on pitching and defense.
The numbers are a little worse when you look at it as a percentage. Someone can probably tell me why I'm wrong, but the percentage seems the better way to go with this.
Entering Monday, the Royals had given up 42.6 percent of their runs with two outs. That's only slightly behind the White Sox (42.9) and Mets (42.7) for worst in baseball. The AL average is 37.2 percent.
When the Royals gagged the big lead against Minnesota, all five Twins runs came with two outs. Maybe it was mercy that Justin Morneau's game-winning homer in the 10th came on the first pitch with no outs, but those are the kinds of things that stick in memories, memories like Guillen's.
Now, I can't say with any sabermetric authority how big an impact consistent two-out runs have. It seems logical.
The Rays (110 two-out runs surrendered, 35.8 percent of their total), Red Sox (120, 36.4), and Cubs (111, 36.3) are all better than average, and they're all on target for the playoffs.
Then again, the Indians (108, 32.9) and Mariners (128, 34.0) are better than the league average, and they might be the two most disappointing teams in baseball.
The White Sox and Angels (129, 41.5) give it up with two outs and are in first place.
So, who knows? Maybe I did all this math to prove nothing.
But it sure figures that a team that can't close out innings --- especially one trying to build on pitching and defense --- will have a hard time winning.
And it also figures that fans who cheer for a team that can't close out innings AND has a high-priced, slugging free agent outfielder known for speaking his mind will probably hear some frustration.
Of course, the man is batting .437 with six home runs, 22 RBIs, and an .817 slugging percentage his last 17 games.
Even with his "horse (bleep)" start, he's projecting to hit .293 with 28 homers and 128 RBIs. That last number is more than twice Emil Brown's team-leading total from last year (Guillen is two away from matching Emil's 62 from 2007) and would be the team's highest mark since Mike Sweeney's club record 144 in 2000.
Royals fans won't mind if he continues to let out his frustration like this.


Guillen has backed up his comments with his play. But let's put that aside for right now. Let's look at what he said. First, he has placed blame on himself as much as the rest of the team. He has not called any players out individually. He has defended Hillman when the media questioned him. I see nothing wrong with what he is doing. He is not out of line with anything he has said and he doesn't put himself above everyone else.
If he keeps performing and behaving himself as he has, I will not have anything against his blow ups. If anything, they have been warranted.